Nanette Porter March 2, 2020 Immigration
Sadly, this means the outcome of the case might depend upon arbitrary elements the judge to whom the is delegated, whether has , and the ethnic and identity of judge, rather than the of the claim.
The next most cited for reform is to change the immigration courts into Articles I Legislative Court." "Article I Courts be staffed with judges who lack life tenure since they don't exercise'' judicial acts for the national Constitution requires that judges insulated from politics." these courts handle technical and specialty matters beyond the ken of expertise of different and judges. Although the judges on these courts lack lifetime tenure, such courts provide a modicum of liberty and transparency missing from the EOIR based immigration system.
Unlike Article III judges, immigration court judges do not need lifetime tenure. As a question of fact, there's absolutely no term of office for an immigration judge. My anecdotal experience the law judges has directed me to recognize that nearly all of the judges from the enforcement side of their immigration or other places within the Department of Justice have functioned between ten and twenty . Usually their appointment within an immigration is that the crowning success of their livelihood where they function the following ten to twenty decades and then retire.
At a 1997 Immigration Judge Dana Leigh Marks, former president at the National Association of Immigration Judges, advocated for producing immigration courts an Article I Court. She , in part: